- MEDICAL RECERTIFICATION OF AVIATORS WITH MEDICAL, NEUROLOGIC AND PSYCHIATRIC
CONDITIONS.
- HEAD INJURY, ALCOHOLISM, HIV ETC.
- EVALUATION OF PILOTS WITH PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS
- PROFICIENCY PROBLEMS (BUSTED PC)
- TRANSITION TRAINING PROBLEMS (727 -> 767)
- BASELINE TESTING
- USAF ENHANCED FLIGHT SCREEN PROGRAM
- AIRLINE NEW HIRES
- PILOT SELECTION
CogScreen and Flight Performance (Review 1)
- Studies Documenting Relationship Between CogScreen and Flight Performance
Hyland DT et al
Age 60 Study, Part IV: Experimental evaluation of pilot performance. Washington DC: Office of Aviation Medicine 1994; DOT/FAA/AM-94/23.
Yakimovich et al
CogScreen as a predictor of flight performance in Russian pilots. Paper presented at 65th annual meeting of the Aerospace Medical Association, San Antonio, TX, May 1994.
CogScreen and Flight Performance (Review 2)
- Studies Documenting Relationship Between CogScreen and Flight Performance
Hoffmann CC et al
The Role that cognitive ability plays in CRM. Paper presented at NATO Symposium, Human Factors & Medicine Panel on collaborative Crew Performance in Complex Operational Systems, Edinburgh, Scotland, April 1998.
Taylor et al
Relationship of CogScreen-AE to Flight Simulator Performance and Pilot Age. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 71(4) 373-380, 2000.
CogScreen and Flight Performance (Yakimovich)
Yakimovich et al. (1994). Russian Flight Data Recorder (FDR) Study
METHOD: Analyzed logs of flight parameter violations obtained from FDR. Violation frequency was compared to CogScreen test performance.
Violations were obtained from a computer program which analyzes flight data recorder information. The list of violations were obtained for 75 Captains over a period of 3 years in two commercial jet aircraft (IL-86 and TU-154).
RESULTS: Flight performance was found to be significantly correlated (p < .01) with 11 CogScreen variables. Correlations ranged from r=.30 to r=.17 (highest for DAT, SAT, BDS, MTS)
Regression Analysis
TU-154 x DAT,DTT,SAT R2=.32
IL-86 x PF, BDS, DTT R2=.46
CogScreen and Flight Performance (Taylor)
Taylor et al. (2000). Relationship between CogScreen AE factor scores and flight simulator performance in aircraft pilots aged 50-69
METHOD: Subjects: 100 licensed pilots, 58 +/- 3 years
Simulator: Frasca Model 141
Flight parameters: staying on course, dialing in communication frequencies, avoiding conflicting traffic, monitoring cockpit instruments, executing approach.
Analysis used five composite CogScreen scores:
Speed/Working Memory, Visual Association Memory, Motor Coordination, Tracking. Attribute Identification
RESULTS: CogScreen Speed/Working Memory had the highest correlation with the flight summary score (r=0.57)
Four CogScreen variables could account for 45% of the variance in flight summary scores: Speed/Working Memory, Visual Associative Memory, Motor Coordination, Tracking
 |
||
 |
Aeromedical Edition
Overview Sample Report Applications Aviation Pharmaceutical Research Industrial Sub Test Description References About the Developer Order Form HOME 877.COG.WARE
|
 |
 |
||
|
| |
| All information in this website is copyrighted. Their reproduction or adaptation, in whole or in part. for any purpose or by any process. without prior written permission from CogScreen, is a violation of copyright law. This policy applies to all tests and all test materials, including quoted materials found in manuals, brochures, or books. | |